SafeMoon Executives Accused in Significant Crypto Scandal, Investor Concerns on the Rise

SafeMoon Executives Accused in Significant Crypto Scandal, Investor Concerns on the Rise

SafeMoon, a name once synonymous with skyrocketing crypto gains, is now the center of a major scandal. U.S. authorities have charged the top executives with fraud.

SafeMoon’s Downfall

SafeMoon executives have been indicted for fraud. The company’s once high-flying token has plunged, causing concerns among crypto investors.

Who’s Been Charged?

Founder Kyle Nagy, CEO Braden John Karony, and former CTO Thomas Smith face criminal counts, including conspiracy to commit securities fraud.

What Did They Do?

The executives allegedly diverted millions of investor dollars for personal luxuries, like sports cars and expensive homes.

Legal Actions

The U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC have filed criminal and civil charges, signaling a tough stance against crypto fraud.

No Comment From SafeMoon

Neither SafeMoon nor the charged executives have yet responded to the allegations, leaving investors in the dark.

“Locked” Liquidity Pools

SafeMoon promised that investor money was securely “locked” to maintain liquidity. This assurance has now been called into question.

Failed Promises

Claims of taking the token “Safely to the Moon” fell flat. Investors are left with significant losses, shaking trust in similar crypto ventures.

Lavish Lifestyles

Court documents reveal that the executives lived a lavish lifestyle financed by money that was supposed to be locked away.


Thomas Smith was quoted celebrating their alleged fraudulent success, highlighting the audacity of the accused executives.

Plummeting Value

After the charges, SafeMoon’s value dropped drastically, from billions to about $50 million, according to CoinMarketCap.

Executives Arrested

Karony was arrested in Utah, and Smith in New Hampshire. Nagy is still at large, adding another layer of complexity to the case.

SEC’s Warnings

SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s previous warnings about crypto seem validated, as the case exemplifies the risks tied to crypto investments.

Investor Dilemma

This scandal places crypto investors in a tight spot, forced to reassess the legitimacy and risk factors associated with tokens.

Falling Trust

SafeMoon’s case undermines investor trust, not just in the token but potentially in the broader U.S. capital market for cryptocurrencies.

A Wake-up Call

The event serves as a wake-up call for investors to exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence before investing in crypto.

Moving Forward

Investors should take this as a lesson, stay updated on legal developments, and possibly reevaluate other similar investment options.

A Cautionary Tale

The SafeMoon scandal provides a cautionary tale, reminding all crypto investors of the crucial need for vigilance and thorough background checks. 

Tighter Regulation Needed?

This case may just be the tip of the iceberg, signaling the need for tighter regulations and transparent operations in the rapidly evolving crypto space.

More From Thrifty Guardian

Financial Sector’s Fossil Fuel Investments: Over $1 Trillion Raised Amidst Growing Climate Concerns

New Study Reveals Life-Saving Impact of Early Hormone Therapy Access for Transgender Adults

The post SafeMoon Executives Accused in Significant Crypto Scandal, Investor Concerns on the Rise first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / G-Stock Studio.

School Increases Security Measures After LGBTQ Post Leads to Harassment and Threats, Prompting Concerns Over a Prank Gone Awry

School Increases Security Measures After LGBTQ Post Leads to Harassment and Threats, Prompting Concerns Over a Prank Gone Awry

A post online has led to a school in Iowa taking drastic security measures. Here’s the full story. 

Controversial Influencer

A recent incident involving a post by a teacher in Des Moines, Iowa, has prompted increased security measures in the school district after it became the target of a controversial online influencer known as Chaya Raichik.

Joke Gone Wrong 

The controversy unfolded when a teacher posted a picture with the words, “Every day is another opportunity to force kids in public schools to be gay,” online. 

Satirical Comment

The post was intended as a satirical comment on the unfounded belief, particularly held by Raichik and her followers, that teachers are influencing students’ sexual orientation. 

Negative Responses

Raichik, boasting about the impact of her online presence, tweeted that the school had “just locked their replies after getting ratioed,” indicating a surge in negative responses to the post. 

Enhanced Security Measures

In response to the online harassment triggered by Raichik and her followers, Des Moines Public Schools felt compelled to enhance security measures. 

Law Enforcement Notified

A district spokesperson explained, “Because of harassment and even threats triggered because of an employee’s social media post, we have had to increase our public safety presence at a school and notify law enforcement.” 

Documented Disruptions

The district expressed concern, emphasizing their commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of students and staff.

The spokesperson specifically highlighted the documented disruptions caused by Raichik’s anti-LGBTQ+ posts in various institutions across the country.

Threats and Harassment

It has been noted that there is a correlation between LibsofTikTok’s online activism and incidents of threats and harassment directed at hospitals, schools, libraries, and individuals targeted by the account. 

Media Matters

Media Matters, a media watchdog nonprofit, documented 33 instances of threats and harassment against 25 different institutions between February 2022 and October 2023, following Raichik’s online targeting. 

Bomb and Death Threats

There have been numerous confirmed bomb threats, death threats, and other forms of harassment linked to the account’s posts, with at least two dozen bomb threats directed at schools and libraries during the summer and fall of 2023 alone. 

Poor Attempt at Humor

Responding to the alarming situation, Des Moines Superintendent Ian Roberts released a statement characterizing the teacher’s original post as “a poor attempt at humor and sarcasm.” 

Inclusive and Accepting

Roberts clarified the district’s stance, asserting that Des Moines Public Schools is an inclusive and accepting environment, proud to be Iowa’s most diverse school community. 

“Quality Education”

Expressing frustration at the disruptions caused by Raichik’s online activism, Roberts emphasized, “Our schools and teachers are focused on providing a quality education to our students, which does not include encouraging or forcing any student to identify with any specific sexual orientation.” 


Despite the controversy and security concerns, Raichik appeared unapologetic, sharing a picture on social media where she held up a copy of the USA Today article, smiling, and referring to the threats as a “huge achievement.” 

“A Joke Is a Joke”

Online the news led to an outcry, with one poster commenting “Thicken your skin, a joke is a joke.  Leave it to a hate monger to not be able to take a joke.” 

“Hard to Tell When Someone Is Joking”

However, some people spoke out in support of Raichik, with one widely shared post stating “Gotta Admit, Libs of TikTok can be pretty funny.  Hard to tell when someone is joking or not when it’s all nuts.”

More From Thrifty Guardian

Financial Sector’s Fossil Fuel Investments: Over $1 Trillion Raised Amidst Growing Climate Concerns

New Study Reveals Life-Saving Impact of Early Hormone Therapy Access for Transgender Adults

The post School Increases Security Measures After LGBTQ Post Leads to Harassment and Threats, Prompting Concerns Over a Prank Gone Awry first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Cynthia Farmer.

Connecticut School’s ‘After School Satan Club’ Raises Concerns Among Community Members

Connecticut School’s ‘After School Satan Club’ Raises Concerns Among Community Members

A small Connecticut town is at the center of a storm of controversy as the Satanic Temple plans to launch the “After School Satan Club. Here’s the full story.

“After School Satan Club”

A small town in Connecticut is grappling with controversy as the Satanic Temple, based in Salem, Massachusetts, announces its intention to launch the “After School Satan Club” at Lebanon Elementary School on December 1, causing concern among parents and sparking discussions about freedom of speech. 

Not Devil Worship

Despite its provocative name, the Satanic Temple insists that the club is not about devil worship but rather a non-theistic religion that views Satan as a symbolic figure representing the rejection of tyranny and the championing of the human mind and spirit. 

Not Looking To Convert

The group emphasizes that their aim is not to convert children to any specific religion but to encourage independent thinking. 

Diverse Activities

The club’s activities are diverse, including science projects, community service, puzzles, games, nature activities, and arts and crafts. 

Parents Worries

However, some parents in the community express worry about the club’s intentions, fearing it might be an attempt to steer children away from religion. 

Satan Is Like Cigarettes

Amy Bourdan, who runs Parent’s Choice, an advocacy group promoting religious freedom, likened the situation to deceptive marketing, saying, “I liken it to the Camel cigarettes used to entice the youth and children.” 

After School Club

The Satanic Temple chose Lebanon for its meetings because the town already hosts an after-school Good News Christian club. 

“Not Changing the Politics”

Lucien Greaves, a co-founder of the Satanic Temple, explained, “We’re not changing the politics here. This is something people should have recognized from the start.” 

Freedom of Speech

While some residents view the issue as a matter of freedom of speech and support the club’s right to host meetings, others in the community are uneasy about its presence. 

Complex Situation

Dori Dougal, a Lebanon resident, acknowledges the complexities of the situation, saying, “This is a free country. We’re supposed to have freedom of religion or no religion, so I can understand both sides of the story.” 

“Equal Protection”

Lebanon Public Schools did not respond to inquiries, but Superintendent Andrew Gonzalez stated that prohibiting the group could violate the district’s “obligations under the First Amendment and other applicable law and would not align with our commitment to non-discrimination, equal protection, and respect for diverse viewpoints.” 

Resistance in Virginia

This isn’t the first time the “After School Satan Club” has faced resistance. In Virginia, the club encountered challenges before being allowed to host meetings at B.M. Williams Primary School. 

American Civil Liberties Union

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Virginia highlighted the unequal treatment, noting that the Christian Good News Club faced no security fee or time restrictions. Despite initial hurdles, the ACLU considered the Virginia meeting a victory for free speech. 

Judge’s Ruling

Similarly, in Pennsylvania, a federal judge ruled in May that a school district must allow the Satanic Temple’s club to meet after initially barring their activities. The ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Satanic Temple, emphasizing the importance of free speech rights. 

Controversy Unfolding

As the controversy unfolds in Lebanon, the community grapples with balancing the principles of free speech with concerns about the potential impact on children and their religious beliefs.

Online Reaction

Online the news was met with mixed reactions, with some supporting the move and others against it.

One person commented “Either allow all religious clubs for after school programs or none of them.”

Another said simply “Hail Satan!”

“Chase Them Out of the School”

However, some were against the decision, with one such commenter posting “The parents need to chase them out of the school.”

More From Thrifty Guardian

Financial Sector’s Fossil Fuel Investments: Over $1 Trillion Raised Amidst Growing Climate Concerns

New Study Reveals Life-Saving Impact of Early Hormone Therapy Access for Transgender Adults

The post Connecticut School’s ‘After School Satan Club’ Raises Concerns Among Community Members first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Inside Creative House.

Texas Counties Restrict Travel for Abortions to ‘Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn,’ Sparking Constitutional Concerns and Discussions on Reproductive Rights

Texas Counties Restrict Travel for Abortions to ‘Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn,’ Sparking Constitutional Concerns and Discussions on Reproductive Rights

Lubbock County, Texas, has taken a significant step in the ongoing debate over abortion by voting to prohibit the transportation of individuals seeking abortions along its roads. This decision reflects a broader effort by conservative activists to further restrict abortion access following the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Similar Bans

Lubbock now stands as the largest jurisdiction to implement such a restriction on abortion-related transportation since the landmark decision was overturned in June 2022.

Nine Texan cities and counties have considered such bans, with six already adopting them.

Future Votes

Further north, the Amarillo City Council is set to discuss a similar law, which may lead to a future city-wide vote.

Both Lubbock and Amarillo are connected by major highways, facilitating travel between Texas, a state with one of the strictest abortion laws in the U.S., and New Mexico, where abortion remains legal.

Supporting The Existing Ban

Supporters of these proposals argue that they aim to reinforce Texas’ existing abortion ban, allowing private citizens to sue those who provide or assist with abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.

Texas License Plates

One supporter, Jewel Navarrette from Las Cruces, New Mexico, explained, “Every day we see cars pulling into the abortion clinic, most often women with Texas license plates.”

Unconstitutional Folk

However, critics of the measure argue that it would only serve to intimidate individuals seeking abortions without effectively reducing the number of abortions performed.

As Lubbock resident Shelley Kemp asserted, “Travel bans are unconstitutional, folks.”

Reliance on Citizen Enforcements

No violations have been reported in the five jurisdictions that have previously adopted similar bans. The reliance on citizen enforcement makes these bans difficult to challenge in court.

Energizing the Base

The impact of these ordinances seems to extend beyond the actual enforcement.

Both sides of the abortion debate are leveraging these measures to energize their voter base as they approach an election year where abortion remains a divisive issue.

Questionable Legality

During a recent meeting in Lubbock County, Judge Curtis Parrish expressed his support for the intent of the measure but questioned its legal effectiveness within the limited legislative scope of the county.

Parrish said, “I continue to wonder what this ordinance is trying to legally accomplish.” As a result, he abstained from voting, along with another commissioner, while three commissioners voted in favor.

Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn

The initiative to ban abortion-related transportation in Texas was spearheaded by Christian pastor Mark Lee Dickson, who began promoting the concept of “sanctuary cities for the unborn” in 2019.

A Pro-Abortion Administration

At the Lubbock County meeting, Dickson emphasized the urgency of passing the transport ban during a time of significant cultural change.

He characterized the current U.S. government as the “most aggressive pro-abortion administration in the history of America.”

Dickinson’s Early Success

Dickson actively travels to promote his measures and mobilizes supporters to unseat local leaders who oppose his proposals. His goal is to elect officials who align with far-right policies.

This approach proved successful in Odessa’s city elections in 2022, leading to adopting a sanctuary city ordinance, the state’s first abortion transport ban, and other measures.

A Lack of Clarity

However, it’s important to note that not all abortion restriction supporters endorse Dickson’s transport bans.

Amarillo Mayor Cole Stanley, for instance, supports the “sanctuary city” movement but has concerns regarding the transport bans’ reliance on civil enforcement and the lack of clarity regarding local authorities’ roles.

Groups Voicing Their Opinion

These debates surrounding transport bans are sparking new demonstrations of support for abortion access.

Kimberleigh Gonzalez organized a local Facebook group of 1,100 reproductive rights supporters in Lubbock County to voice their opposition to the measure.

A Strengthening Community

This group emerged in response to approving a “sanctuary city” ordinance in Lubbock in May 2021. Gonzalez emphasized that each new threat to reproductive rights brings their community closer together, stating, “Since 2021, I know a lot of people personally that are involved that weren’t before, and it just continues to grow and strengthen.”

Backfiring Bans

Abortion rights supporters, including four abortion funds in Texas, anticipate that these transport bans will backfire on the anti-abortion movement by rallying political participation among abortion rights advocates in the lead-up to the next presidential election.

Ensuring Consequences

Rachel O’Leary Carmona, executive director of the Women’s March activist organization, declared, “We’re going to make sure that there are political and electoral consequences for this.”

More From Thrifty Guardian

Financial Sector’s Fossil Fuel Investments: Over $1 Trillion Raised Amidst Growing Climate Concerns

New Study Reveals Life-Saving Impact of Early Hormone Therapy Access for Transgender Adults

The post Texas Counties Restrict Travel for Abortions to ‘Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn,’ Sparking Constitutional Concerns and Discussions on Reproductive Rights first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Novikov Aleksey.

North Dakota Court Temporarily Blocks Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

North Dakota Court Temporarily Blocks Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

A judge in North Dakota has caused controversy by not blocking the state’s new law banning gender-affirming care for minors. Here’s the full story. 

Refusing to Block the Ban

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Denis—S

A North Dakota judge has made a crucial decision by refusing to immediately block the state’s ban on gender-affirming health care for minors, delivering an initial setback to those challenging the law’s constitutionality. 

Restraining Order Denied

Image Credit: Shutterstock /

On Monday, District Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a temporary restraining order requested by the plaintiffs, who are families advocating against the ban. 

January Hearing

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

The families had also sought a preliminary injunction to temporarily halt the law’s enforcement while their case progresses, with a hearing scheduled for January. 

Gender Justice

Image Credit: Shutterstock / AlexLMX

While expressing disappointment in the ruling, Brittany Stewart of Gender Justice, the lead attorney representing the families and a pediatrician involved in the lawsuit, conveyed confidence in the ultimate resolution: “We’re disappointed in this ruling, but we are confident that when all the evidence has been presented, the court will ultimately find that ending the health care ban permanently is the only just, equitable, and constitutional resolution.” 

Five Month Delay

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Voronin76

Judge Lofgren based his decision on the plaintiffs’ “nearly five-month delay” in filing their complaint and their argument relying on recognizing a protected class not previously acknowledged by the North Dakota Supreme Court or new applications of state constitutional principles. 

Criminalizing Health Care

Image Credit: Shutterstock / megaflopp

The North Dakota law criminalizes healthcare providers performing gender-affirmation surgery on minors, making it a felony, and prescribing or administering hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a child, considered a misdemeanor. 

Irreversible Effects

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Radharani

Supporters argue that the ban safeguards children from what they perceive as irreversible effects of such treatments and surgeries. 

Self Harm Epidemic 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Marjan Apostolovic

On the other hand, opponents contend that it endangers transgender youth, who already face a higher risk of depression, self-harm, and suicide, and emphasize that no such surgeries were being performed in North Dakota. 

Keeping the Law Vague

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Asier Romero

While a grandfather clause was included for children already undergoing treatments before Republican Governor Doug Burgum signed the law in April, providers find it vague, leading to a reluctance to take the risk. 

Out of State

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Africa Studio

Consequently, families have been compelled to travel out of state to secure gender-affirming care for their children. 

Multiple States, Multiple Lawsuits

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

North Dakota joins approximately two dozen states with Republican-led legislatures that have implemented bans on gender-affirming care for minors in recent years, triggering multiple ongoing lawsuits. 

Deep Divides 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Pickadook

In several states, judges have temporarily halted the enforcement of these bans while legal proceedings unfold, illustrating the contentious nature of these laws and the deep divides in perspectives on gender-affirming care for minors.

Online Controversy 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Mangostar

The news led to a lot of controversy online, with many users arguing for, and against, the perceived benefits and harms of gender-affirming care. 

“What Happened Was Not Right”

Image Credit: Shutterstock / pathdoc

One commenter, who clearly supported the ban, posted “One day there will be an epidemic of young adults that grew up and realized what happened was not right, they were not ready for such a life change, with regret they will suffer a lifetime for these choices.”

“Pushing Their Agenda”

Image Credit: Shutterstock / nakaridore

However, others spoke out against the judges decision, with one such user posting “I’m curious to know why Republicans think they can push their agenda on others. We know hypocrisy is the conservative way. What happened to letting the parents and not politicians decide?” 

“Cuts the Rate of Depression”

Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes

Another pointed out that the gender-affirming care given to children was often not permanent, which is usually the case with the care given to adults, commenting, “A doctor following appropriate medical guidelines will not do anything permanent to a minor child. A parent who properly researches the subject for themselves wouldn’t allow it. There is nothing wrong with giving a child gender-affirming care. It cuts the rates of depression and suicide by more than half.”

The post North Dakota Court Temporarily Blocks Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / GamePixel.

Exploring Access to Reproductive Health: Understanding the Mosaic of State-Specific Abortion Laws in the U.S.

Exploring Access to Reproductive Health: Understanding the Mosaic of State-Specific Abortion Laws in the U.S.

As the abortion laws continue to change state by state, stay informed about the most recent updates and how they may affect your own access to an abortion. 

The Recent Developments

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

In the ever-evolving realm of abortion legislation, recent developments spotlight the contentious issue of blocking individuals from assisting others in crossing state lines for abortion services 

Idaho & Alabama in the Spotlight

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

A federal judge’s ruling in Idaho and the U.S. Department of Justice’s stance on an Alabama lawsuit have stirred debates, hinting at the potential trajectory of this emerging facet of abortion regulation. 

The Post-roe Landscape

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

In the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, states across the nation, particularly those under Republican control, have implemented stringent abortion bans. 

The Stark Contrast

Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes

This stark contrast with blue states, which have bolstered efforts to protect access, has accentuated the significance of travel for abortion services.

Impact on Abortion Numbers

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Africa Studio

The landscape shift has not only ignited policy debates but also altered the dynamics of abortion rates. 

Increasing Rates of Abortion Shock Red Voters

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Monster Ztudio

Despite a decline in abortion numbers in states where it is prohibited throughout pregnancy, a national survey indicates a slight increase in monthly abortion averages since the Supreme Court’s decision. 

Travel Bans for Reproductive Rights

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Castleski

This has catapulted the issue of travel for abortion into the forefront of reproductive rights discussions.

Legal Ambiguities and Travel Rights

Image Credit: Shutterstock / winnond

Legal experts remain uncertain about the fate of regulations hindering people from aiding others in crossing state lines for abortion. 

NYU Professor Speaks Out

Image Credit: Shutterstock / l i g h t p o e t

Melissa Murray, a professor at New York University School of Law, highlights the complex interplay between the right to travel and the intent behind such journeys. 

Murray’s Statement

Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes

Murray said, “Individuals have a right to travel,” continuing, “It’s not clear that people have the right to travel when they’re doing so to help someone leave the state for abortion elsewhere”.

The Ambiguity at Play

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Evgenia Parajanian

The ambiguity surrounding whether individuals possess the right to travel for the purpose of assisting someone seeking an abortion elsewhere adds layers of complexity to these legal deliberations.

Idaho’s “Abortion Trafficking” Ban

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Studio Romantic

Idaho took a pioneering step by adopting an “abortion trafficking” ban, criminalizing the act of obtaining abortion pills for minors or assisting a minor in seeking an abortion out of state without parental consent. 

Constitutional Questions Raised

Image Credit: Shutterstock /

While this law raises constitutional questions, a federal judge recently placed its enforcement on hold, recognizing broader implications related to freedom of speech, due process, and parental rights.

Alabama Lawsuit and Justice Department Intervention

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Castleski

In Alabama, abortion rights advocates challenged the state’s attorney general, Steve Marshall, over potential use of anti-conspiracy laws against those aiding out-of-state abortions. 

DOJ Intervenes

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Heidi Besen

The U.S. Department of Justice intervened, asserting that the state cannot impede individuals from traveling for legal abortions. The outcome of this case remains pending, leaving the broader legal landscape in flux.

Local Laws Enter the Fray

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Salivanchuk Semen

Several Texas counties have adopted ordinances enabling private citizens to sue individuals assisting women in traveling for abortions on specific local roads. 

More Complications

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Goksi

These local laws, concentrated in proximity to states with more lenient abortion regulations, add another layer of complexity. 

No Lawsuits Yet

Image Credit: Shutterstock / ViDI Studio

As of now, no reported lawsuits have emerged under these laws, and their legal standing remains untested.

Future Remains Unclear

Image Credit: Shutterstock / ShotPrime Studio

In a landscape marked by legal uncertainties and evolving reproductive rights, the battle over crossing state lines for abortion unfolds on multiple fronts, holding profound implications for the future of abortion access and individual rights.

The post Exploring Access to Reproductive Health: Understanding the Mosaic of State-Specific Abortion Laws in the U.S. first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / christinarosepix.