by G. Gallacher | news
The White House unveiled a strategy to address rising inflation by invoking a Cold War-era Act amidst concerns over economic challenges and voter anger. Here’s the full story.
Supply Chain Challenges
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Orhan Cam
The White House has unveiled a strategy to address supply chain challenges, aiming to curb the inflation that has become a significant concern for the Biden administration.
Defense Production Act
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Consolidated News Photos
To achieve this goal, President Joe Biden plans to invoke the Defense Production Act of 1950, a Cold War era law initially designed to streamline production during the Korean War.
National Security
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Viktor_IS
This move comes as part of a broader effort to enhance domestic manufacturing of essential medicines vital for national security.
“Keep Working to Bring Down Prices”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Pickadook
“We’re determined to keep working to bring down prices for American consumers and ensure the resilience of our supply chains for the future,” said Lael Brainard, director of the White House National Economic Council and co-chair of the new supply chain council, emphasizing the commitment to address these economic challenges.
Key Role
Image Credit: Shutterstock / El Nariz
The Defense Production Act, previously utilized during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, will play a key role in this initiative.
Bolstering Production
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Monster Ztudio
The Act was employed to accelerate the production and availability of ventilators and personal protective equipment.
Now, the focus is on bolstering the production of critical medicines to enhance national security.
Improved Data Sharing
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
The newly established supply chain council, co-chaired by Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser, will tackle various issues, including improved data sharing between government agencies, renewable energy resources, and freight logistics.
“Bidenomics”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Trevor Bexon
Despite positive economic indicators on paper, the Biden administration acknowledges that the economic improvements are not universally felt by consumers.
The White House has directly associated the economic performance with President Biden, terming it “Bidenomics.”
Falling Approval Rates
Image Credit: Shutterstock / New Africa
However, recent polls indicate a challenge for the administration, with only 39% of voters approving of Biden’s handling of jobs and the economy.
“Get the Ball Rolling”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Sodel Vladyslav
“The Biden administration’s announcement is another step in the right direction,” Moody’s economist Jesse Rogers said.
“While unlikely to resolve some of the more complex issues plaguing supply chains in one go, measures targeting pharmaceuticals, climate infrastructure, data security, and logistics will bolster resilience and get the ball rolling on smart infrastructure and global cooperation.”
Sky High Inflation
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Lightspring
The pressing issue of inflation adds to the complexity of the economic landscape. While inflation has slowed, consumers are grappling with a burden not experienced in years.
A Decade in Three Years
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Tero Vesalainen
Prices have surged significantly in the past three years, equivalent to the rise seen in the previous decade.
Prices Climbing
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Andrii Yalanskyi
Groceries and electricity are up 25%, used-car prices have climbed 35%, auto insurance has risen by 33%, and rent has increased by approximately 20% since January 2020.
Calls for Change
Image Credit: Shutterstock / mantinov
Housing affordability has reached a record low, with auto-loan rates and credit card interest rates also peaking.
These challenges have prompted calls from within the Democratic Party for a reevaluation of Biden’s economic messaging ahead of the 2024 election.
Money in Your Pocket
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gatot Adri
“When supply chains are smooth, prices fall for goods, food, and equipment, putting more money in the pockets of American families, workers, farmers, and entrepreneurs,” stated the White House.
International Collaboration
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Monkey Business Images
The administration underscores the importance of robust supply chains for a strong economy.
In addition to domestic measures, the Biden administration intends to strengthen global supply chains by collaborating internationally.
Early Warning Systems
Image Credit: Shutterstock / beeboys
Early warning systems will be developed with allies and partners to detect and respond to supply chain disruptions in critical areas.
This includes efforts to improve weather, water, and climate observing capabilities and data-sharing, aiming to produce global climate information and minimize impacts on infrastructure, water, health, and food security.
Inflation Challenges
Image Credit: Shutterstock / FOTOGRIN
The comprehensive strategy seeks to address the multifaceted challenges of supply chain resilience and inflation, with a focus on tangible and measurable actions to benefit American consumers and the overall economy.
More From Thrifty Guardian
Thousands of Children of Illegal Immigrants May Be Deported: US Supreme Court Decides Fate of “Dreamers”
Ramaswamy Would End “Birthright Citizenship”: Believes Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported as a Family Unit
The post Biden’s Plan to Tackle Rising Prices and Address Corporate Greed Using Cold-War Era Law first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Evan El-Amin. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.
by G. Gallacher | Tech
Countries, including the U.S. and the U.K., join forces in an international agreement, unveiling a pact to ensure the responsible and secure development of artificial intelligence. Here’s the full story.
Securing AI From Misuse
Image Credit: Shutterstock / William Potter
A non-binding international agreement involving the United States, the United Kingdom, and 16 other nations was unveiled on Sunday, marking what a senior US official calls the first detailed international pact on securing artificial intelligence (AI) from misuse.
“Secure By Design”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Andrey_Popov
The 20-page document emphasizes the importance of developing AI systems that are “secure by design,” urging companies to prioritize safety in their design and deployment processes.
Multiple Signatories
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Pickadook
The agreement, signed by countries such as Germany, Italy, Australia, and Singapore, contains general recommendations aimed at guiding companies in the responsible development and use of AI.
These recommendations include monitoring AI systems for abuse, safeguarding data from tampering, and vetting software suppliers.
Non-Binding Agreement
Image Credit: Shutterstock / New Africa
Although non-binding, the agreement signifies a collective commitment to prioritizing security in the design phase of AI development.
Not Just Cool Features
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
Jen Easterly, the director of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, highlighted the significance of the agreement, stating, “This is the first time that we have seen an affirmation that these capabilities should not just be about cool features and how quickly we can get them to market or how we can compete to drive down costs.”
Security is Paramount
Image Credit: Shutterstock / pathdoc
Easterly emphasized that the guidelines represent a consensus that security should be a paramount consideration during the design of AI systems.
Not Enforceable
Image Credit: Shutterstock / spaxiax
While initiatives like this agreement attempt to shape the development of AI globally, few carry enforceable measures.
Security Testing
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
The document addresses concerns about preventing the hijacking of AI technology by hackers, proposing measures such as thorough security testing before releasing AI models.
Ethics Left Out
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
However, it does not delve into complex questions surrounding the ethical use of AI or the gathering of data that fuels these systems.
Great Potential for Misuse
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
The rise of AI has sparked various apprehensions, including fears of its potential to disrupt democratic processes, facilitate fraud, and lead to substantial job loss.
Europe Leading the Way
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
Europe has taken the lead in AI regulations, with lawmakers working on drafting rules to govern its development and deployment.
Codes of Conduct
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Fabio Principe
Countries like France, Germany, and Italy have also reached an agreement emphasizing “mandatory self-regulation through codes of conduct” for foundational AI models designed to generate diverse outputs.
U.S. Falls Behind
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Vladeep
In contrast, the United States has encountered challenges in passing comprehensive AI regulations, with a polarized Congress impeding progress.
A Matter of National Security
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Niyazz
The Biden administration has advocated for AI regulation to mitigate risks to consumers, workers, and minority groups while strengthening national security.
In October, the White House issued an executive order aimed at addressing AI risks, emphasizing the need for responsible development and deployment practices.
More From Thrifty Guardian
Thousands of Children of Illegal Immigrants May Be Deported: US Supreme Court Decides Fate of “Dreamers”
Ramaswamy Would End “Birthright Citizenship”: Believes Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported as a Family Unit
The post U.S. and U.K. Join International Pact to Ensure Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence Amidst Growing Concerns first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Stokkete. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.
by G. Gallacher | news
The Biden Administration has got a win in the Supreme Court online censorship battle, leaving some judges concerned. Here’s the full story.
Social Media Freedom
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff
The Supreme Court has tentatively sided with the Biden administration regarding a dispute related to freedom of speech and social media content.
Election Infection
Image Credit: Shutterstock / mariakray
The case revolves around allegations that officials in the White House and federal agencies pressured social media companies to suppress content regarding the election and COVID-19.
Censorship Concerns
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
While this may seem like a temporary win for the administration, it has sparked concerns about censorship.
“Momentous, Thorny Issues”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff
“This is an immensely important case,” said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.
“These are momentous, thorny issues, and how the court resolves them will have broad implications for the digital public sphere.”
Disinformation Disinfection
Image Credit: Shutterstock / PanuShot
The Supreme Court’s decision allows the Biden administration to continue interacting with social media platforms to request the removal of disinformation.
However, it also means that the high court will delve into a divisive issue at the intersection of social media and the government.
Conservative Judges Worried
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
Conservative Judge Justice Alito, along with Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, expressed their concerns about government censorship of private speech.
“Highly Disturbing”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Yu Chun Christopher Wong
Justice Alito wrote in his dissent, “Government censorship of private speech is antithetical to our democratic form of government, and therefore today’s decision is highly disturbing.”
Social Media Coercion
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Worawee Meepian
The lawsuit was filed by Republican state attorneys general who alleged that the Biden administration coerced social media platforms to remove content unfavorable to Democrats, including posts about the 2020 election, COVID-19 origins, and the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Don’t Blame the Government
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Herlanzer
The administration, on the other hand, argues that they merely asked platforms to remove harmful disinformation, and the decision to remove the content was made by the companies themselves.
They contend that barring the government from flagging disinformation could have significant consequences for how Americans interact online.
Status Quo Achieved
Image credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff
The Supreme Court’s action maintains the status quo before the courts became involved, allowing the administration to continue its actions for now.
First Amendment Questions
Image Credit: Shutterstock / metamorworks
However, the court is set to decide the underlying First Amendment questions in the case, further entangling itself in the complex and heated political debate over online content, particularly in the midst of a presidential election.
More Cases to Come
Image Credit: Shutterstock / felipe caparros
The intersection of social media and politics has become a prominent theme at the Supreme Court this year.
Justices will hear arguments on October 31 in cases dealing with whether public officials may block constituents on social media.
It’s Always Texas or Florida
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Morakot Kawinchan
Additionally, the high court will rule on two lawsuits challenging laws in Texas and Florida that seek to limit the ability of social media platforms to moderate content.
Federal courts have temporarily blocked these laws which could have far-reaching implications for social media companies’ content moderation practices.
More From Thrifty Guardian
Thousands of Children of Illegal Immigrants May Be Deported: US Supreme Court Decides Fate of “Dreamers”
Ramaswamy Would End “Birthright Citizenship”: Believes Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported as a Family Unit
The post Biden Administration Gains Supreme Court Ground in Social Media Censorship Dispute Amid Concerns first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Alexandros Michailidis. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.
by G. Gallacher | news
Texas’s young Republican circles are in the midst of a divisive situation featuring a big-money donor, a holocaust denier, and Kyle Rittenhouse. Here’s the full story.
With Friends Like These
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Dean Drobot
The recent culmination of an ongoing feud among Texas’s young Republicans came to a head this month.
The catalyst for this clash was a meeting involving prominent GOP donor Jonathan Stickland, far-right influencer Nick Fuentes, and Kyle Rittenhouse, who gained notoriety for his acquittal in a high-profile trial.
Republican Upheaval
Image Credit: Shutterstock / ViDI Studio
These developments have triggered a flurry of allegations and disputes among Texas Republicans, with some state lawmakers now condemning specific factions within the party.
As things settle, young Republican groups in Texas are experiencing notable changes.
Quite the Party
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
Fuentes, a figure with controversial views, including Holocaust denial and controversial statements, held an extensive meeting with Jonathan Stickland, then-president of the ultraconservative Texas donor group Defend Texas Liberty.
Joining them was Kyle Rittenhouse, who faced charges related to the shooting of Black Lives Matter protesters.
Raising Tensions and Eyebrows
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Cast Of Thousands
The meeting raised eyebrows and fueled tensions within the Republican fold. This encounter is not the first time Fuentes has engaged with influential Texas Republicans.
In fact, it has further exacerbated existing divisions within the state’s conservative youth organizations.
“Troll Tactics”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Cast Of Thousands
Earlier this year, the Texas Young Republican Federation (TYRF) severed its ties with the Republican Party of Texas (RPT) due to allegations of “troll tactics” employed by RPT chair Matt Rinaldi.
Schisms and Splinters
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
The dispute revolved around mocking a TYRF leader who publicly supported the “Black lives matter” movement.
This schism led to the emergence of smaller, splinter groups, some of which were associated with far-right or neo-Nazi content and expressed support for Nick Fuentes.
So Many Acronyms
Image Credit: Shutterstock / pathdoc
These splinter groups united to form the Young Republicans of Texas (YRT), presenting themselves as a strong pro-MAGA alternative to the TYRF.
Despite the controversies and concerns, the Texas State Republican Executive Committee (SREC) decided to collaborate with the YRT, earning praise from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton as “the newest generation of Young Republicans.”
Alarm Bells
Image Credit: Shutterstock / G-Stock Studio
However, the meeting between Fuentes and Stickland raised considerable alarm bells among prominent Texas Republicans, leading to a reevaluation of the YRT’s affiliations.
In a letter addressed to Rinaldi, two members of the Texas Executive Committee urged the state party to distance itself from the YRT.
Coffee With Adolf
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi
They expressed their concerns about individuals within the YRT who openly associated with antisemites, even making statements like “I’m antisemitic.”
Another openly and publicly supported Adolf Hitler, commenting, “‘National cold brew day AND Hitler’s bday?! It’s a great day indeed.’”
Sever Ties
Image Credit: Shutterstock / ESB Professional
These concerns have prompted at least two YRT chapters to disassociate from the organization, and they have encouraged the state Republican party to sever ties with the YRT.
“Mismanagement and Untruthfulness”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi
The Gulf Coast and Rural Young Republicans groups, in a joint statement, cited “mismanagement and untruthfulness” within the YRT as a reason for their departure.
They also noted that allegations about members not reflecting the party’s values were initially dismissed but later found to be valid.
Everything Is Worse in Texas
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi
As these developments unfold, the TYRF is reportedly welcoming the two disaffiliated YRT groups into its fold, further altering the landscape of young Republican organizations in Texas.
The conflict within Texas’s young Republican ranks highlights internal tensions within the party.
Divisions Exposed
Image Credit: Shutterstock / pathdoc
The meeting between Fuentes and Stickland has not only exposed these divisions but has also prompted significant shifts in the affiliations of various youth Republican groups.
As the state party grapples with these complexities, it remains to be seen how the future of young Republicans in Texas will evolve.
More From Thrifty Guardian
Thousands of Children of Illegal Immigrants May Be Deported: US Supreme Court Decides Fate of “Dreamers”
Ramaswamy Would End “Birthright Citizenship”: Believes Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported as a Family Unit
The post Young Republican Feud Erupts in Texas: Big Donor, Holocaust Denier, and Rittenhouse at Center of Divisive Showdown first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Eric Rosenwald. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.
by G. Gallacher | news
A deadline is fast upcoming for Donald Trump’s legal team to explain why they need access to a mountain of classified material. Here’s the full story.
Under Scrutiny
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Christopher Halloran
Former President Donald Trump’s legal team is under scrutiny as they approach a deadline to explain the necessity of obtaining a vast array of classified documents for his election fraud case, potentially causing significant delays.
Motion to Dismiss
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Wolfgang Zwanzger
Chief prosecutor Jack Smith filed a submission to dismiss Trump’s request for 57 groups of documents, including highly classified materials related to the Justice Department’s communication with Hunter Biden and Trump’s White House scheduling diary.
Long List of Documents
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Boophuket
The former president’s legal team also sought documents on Russian and Iranian interference in the 2020 election, alleged Chinese hacking, details of undercover agents at the January 6 riot, and extensive correspondence on voting in seven states during the 2020 election.
Further Delay Rejected
Image Credit: Shutterstock / VRVIRUS
Trump’s lawyers were initially required to submit their explanation by Friday, but Judge Tanya Chutkan extended the deadline to Monday, November 27, rejecting their plea for a further delay.
Pleading Not Guilty
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
Facing charges in Washington D.C. for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2020 election results leading up to the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, Trump has pleaded not guilty to four counts, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding.
Substantial Delays
Image Credit: Shutterstock / ESB Professional
The potential disclosure of several million pages of classified documents, similar to a case in Florida, could cause substantial delays in Trump’s election tampering trial.
Security Requirements
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Romankonovalov
In Florida, attorneys must review disclosed documents in secure rooms using ultra-secure laptops.
Trump Goes To Washington
Image Credit: Shutterstock / noamgalai
If Trump’s request is granted, federal security protocols, as per the Classified Information Procedures Act, will need replication in Washington D.C.
Informants, Investigations and Risks
Image Credit: Shutterstock / vovan
The Trump legal team aims to obtain documents regarding informants, election investigations, cybersecurity risks, Dominion Voting Systems, and President Trump’s daily schedule.
Undercover Agents
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi
The request encompasses details on individuals within a 5-mile radius of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, alluding to potential informants or undercover agents.
Cybersecurity Breaches
Image Credit: Shutterstock / photoschmidt
It also seeks information on election-related investigations, cybersecurity breaches involving SolarWinds, Microsoft, and VMWare, and specifics on Dominion Voting Systems.
Election Audits
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
Trump’s legal team is interested in documents related to President Trump’s daily schedule from October 1, 2020, to January 20, 2021, communication between the Special Counsel’s office, DOJ, and the Biden administration, and audits of election results in indicted states.
Accusations of Tampering With The Election
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Niyazz
The indictment accuses Trump of attempting to tamper with election results in Nevada, Michigan, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
Undermining Public Confidence
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Lightspring
The legal team is also pursuing documents on Russian and Iranian campaigns undermining public confidence, as well as claims of election infrastructure control by Venezuela, Cuba, and China.
Time Frame Concerns
Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes
In a separate federal case in Florida, where Trump is accused of hoarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Judge Aileen Cannon has expressed concerns about the time frame for document review, citing potential challenges in meeting realistic deadlines.
Delaying Tactic
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Vulp
Justice Department prosecutor Jay Bratt has argued that Trump’s repeated requests for delays are part of a strategy to prolong legal proceedings.
Significant Impact
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Wisiel
As Trump’s legal team navigates these complex requests, the outcome could significantly impact the timelines and proceedings of both federal cases.
“Enough Stalling”
Image Credit: Shutterstock / ANDREY-SHA74
The news of the upcoming deadline led to a lot of discussion online, with many speaking out about what they see as the Trump legal team using delaying tactics to slow down the trial.
One such post read, “In other words, they’re asking for another five to ten year trial date extension. These guys are ridiculous. If he was innocent of the charges, he’d have been pushing to have this trial over a year ago. Enough stalling.”
Three Years To Prepare
Image Credit: Shutterstock / Freedomz
Others online spoke out in defense of the former President, with one such comment stating, “It took the government over three years to prepare their case against Trump. He should have the same amount of time to prepare his defense. If the government is charging Trump based on classified evidence, he has the right to see that evidence.”
More From Thrifty Guardian
Thousands of Children of Illegal Immigrants May Be Deported: US Supreme Court Decides Fate of “Dreamers”
Ramaswamy Would End “Birthright Citizenship”: Believes Illegal Immigrants Should Be Deported as a Family Unit
The post Trump’s Legal Deadline Looms in Investigation into Classified Documents first appeared on Thrifty Guardian.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / lev radin. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.
